House of Commons - Defence Committee: Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century - HC 1066
Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Defence Committee |
Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
Total Pages | : 44 |
Release | : 2014-03-27 |
ISBN-10 | : 0215069714 |
ISBN-13 | : 9780215069719 |
Rating | : 4/5 (14 Downloads) |
Download or read book House of Commons - Defence Committee: Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century - HC 1066 written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Defence Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2014-03-27 with total page 44 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The MoD's financial settlement in the next Comprehensive Spending Review must be made in the light of the need to retain a credible deterrent capacity in the country's Armed Forces. The Committee welcomes the emphasis that the Government places on the importance of cyber defence and the commitment of resources to a new cyber strike capability. But the difficulty in identifying actors in a cyber attack makes the ability to deter that much harder. Similar questions arise in deterrence against the asymmetrical threat of terrorism as it is difficult to identify interests and groups against which a response can be legitimately targeted. The Committee is calling on the MoD to set out how it can make clear that both cyber and terrorist attack will elicit an appropriate and determined response. Looking at the nuclear deterrent, the Committee points out that the UK's ability to effect a nuclear response is not credible in dealing with all threats, and so strong conventional deterrence is also required. And given the importance of communication to the concept of deterrence, investment in diplomatic and intelligence assets must be integral to the UK's security apparatus. The Committee concludes that it would be naive to assume that a decision not to invest in the nuclear deterrent would release substantial funds for investment in other forms of security. The Committee believes that the decision on the retention of the nuclear deterrent, should be made on its own merits.